Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:13:29 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Message-ID: <199907271713.LAA25874@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199907270316.UAA49808@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907262311020.35843-100000@janus.syracuse.net> <199907270316.UAA49808@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> :That doesn't mean we shouldn't allow people to have an unsophisticated setup, > :just because a sophisticated one is available. It would be useful to have > :a per-firewall-rule counter, decrement it on each match if logging and > :set, and be able to reset to something higher. > : > : Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ > > There may be some confusion here. I am advocating that we *allow* the > zeroing of counters at secure level 3. Sorry Matt, I missed that in my previous posting as well.... Ignore my previous followup. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907271713.LAA25874>