Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:48:42 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot <fbsd-q@bzerk.org> To: Richard Caley <richard@caley.org.uk> Cc: Lefteris Tsintjelis <lefty@ene.asda.gr>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -STABLE was stable for long time (Re: FreeBSD: Server or DesktopOS?) Message-ID: <20021118174842.GA95560@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <200211181705.gAIH5x3B027277@pele.r.caley.org.uk> References: <3DD913C0.BCC0D1D9@ene.asda.gr> <200211181705.gAIH5x3B027277@pele.r.caley.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:05:59PM +0000, Richard Caley typed: > > > > A fix to somethign deep in ther kernel which is not > > > biteing many people? > > > This is something for the commiters to decide and not me. > > Indeed. Isn't the point of this thread, if any, that Marc Fournier was > complaining that a patch to the VM system was not put onto the RELEASE > branch. As you say, it is for the comitters to decide. I was just > saying that it is not really supprising if somethign of this order > doesn't make it into RELEASE, since it potentially has such wide > repercussions. Please stop talking about the "RELEASE branch". There's no such thing. RELEASE is a snapshot taken from the STABLE branch after a period of extensive testing and code-freeze. It's all described very clearly in the handbook. Now can we kill this thread or move it to -chat? > > > http://www.freebsd.org/ > > This will might help you a bit. > > And a politeness transfusion might help you a bit. > > ^_^ > (O O) > \_/@@\ > \\~~/ > ~~ > - RJC > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021118174842.GA95560>