Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:47:26 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Minsoo Choo <minsoochoo0122@proton.me>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Future of jemalloc on FreeBSD after archive
Message-ID:  <202506101247.55AClQIF030588@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <44DDF236-0911-4CE8-AD30-5E1AB5CB25EB@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <sLUPmdWvgjaNJL3ly0NC29emSncHWcPnwkuqJ_v_T2_OsBK9BtdJcm17AeGD-2VBZp7gLEpMis-PiJG7zOueEcBhfVIlIpSVNKWfEgmKFn4=@proton.me> <CANCZdfpgLQD0sC3Hsuy542b1K%2BSpNA8xLGZ96XoOZhhLc1%2Buhg@mail.gmail.com> <44DDF236-0911-4CE8-AD30-5E1AB5CB25EB@FreeBSD.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

--------
David Chisnall writes:

> I've replaced jemalloc with snmalloc (to which I am a contributor)

It looks interesting, but rather than all of us having to do our
own homework, can you give us the "elevator pitch" for it ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202506101247.55AClQIF030588>