Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:05:47 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r266760 - head/contrib/bmake
Message-ID:  <B5500895-4E33-41C7-AACF-77A597A32D7F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140603063512.GB45150@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <201405271839.s4RIdDq8055387@svn.freebsd.org> <538D1DB7.7010508@FreeBSD.org> <20140603044638.81DF6580A1@chaos.jnpr.net> <20140603063512.GB45150@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jun 3, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> =
wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>>=20
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
>>> Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree
>>> checkouts from before 2014-05-05 on src head with this revision.=20
>>=20
>> Yes, an older ports tree would need an older bmake (or fmake).
>> Are we saying ports is *not* ready for that hack to be removed?
>>=20
>=20
> IMHO it is, just people has to be aware of that :)

It would be nice if we could put that code back into make, but have
it disabled. There are several people that use custom old trees that are
hitting this when they build on newer systems=85 While /usr/ports is =
ready,
forks of it might not be.  I=92m cool with having it be turned off by =
default,
but it sure would be convenient to be able to flip it back on=85 Anybody
object if I do this?

Warner




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B5500895-4E33-41C7-AACF-77A597A32D7F>