Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:53:25 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: rcs is gone? Message-ID: <6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <EBF54472-4DF9-42AB-9577-B7CEFFFFFA1E@orthanc.ca> References: <29D748F4-5E38-4587-BC7F-0141234C2F62@orthanc.ca> <F9A84DDF-EC24-42F2-9B34-F5041946293D@orthanc.ca> <EBF54472-4DF9-42AB-9577-B7CEFFFFFA1E@orthanc.ca>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote: > "Install from ports" is a non-starter. Our development systems will never be connected to the internet for a ports upgrade. In this environment, in-base RCS is a very useful tool. Why is install from packages any harder than installing the base system? If you need RCS, then put the pkg and rcs packages in your default installation image. Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems, without any of your own code or any customisation? Davidhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E>