Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 08:44:58 -0700 (PDT) From: delaroca@ucla.edu To: Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Jin Guojun <jin@george.lbl.gov>, denis@acacia.cts.ucla.edu, trouble@webfyre.com, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RSH in 2.2.7 appears to be broken!!! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980724083156.3807A-100000@acacia.cts.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: <xzp67gnv7fv.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Jul 1998, Dag-Erling Coidan [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > delaroca@ucla.edu writes: > > Not quite, Andre Albsmeier early this morning opened problem report 7381 > > and included a fix. Poor quality control let out a bug in rshd.c. > -------------------- > That comment is totally gratuitous. You imply that we are careless; > bear in mind that FreeBSD is largely a volunteer effort and we do not > have the resources to do even one tenth of the QC and testing a > commercial vendor does. We do our best, but a couple of mistakes > always slip through here and there. No I didn't imply overall carelessness, sorry! I just objected to rshd.c having been changed and apparently the changes not having been tested even minimally to have detected a small careless programming mistake... what would you call that? And yes, myself too have been guilty of rushing code changes into prodution without adequate testing. -- Denis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980724083156.3807A-100000>