Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:12:41 -0700 From: "Sameer R. Manek" <manek@ecst.csuchico.edu> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: ioctl man page Message-ID: <LMEMIKHGPPEEMMMMGIENMEAMENAA.manek@ecst.csuchico.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is this intentional, or just an oversight?
The third argument to ioctl is traditionally named char *argp. Most
uses
of ioctl in FreeBSD 3.0 however, require the third argument to be a
caddr_t or an int.
Should the 3.0 be updated, to 4.6, or just removed all together? Or perhaps
rewritten to something like this
"Most uses of ioctl since FreeBSD 3.0 require ....."
Sameer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sameer R. Manek Email: manek@ghur.net
"What one has not experienced, one will never understand in print."
--Isadora Duncan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LMEMIKHGPPEEMMMMGIENMEAMENAA.manek>