Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:23:42 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> To: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: External toolchain reliance Message-ID: <CAKBkRUwNmCbNbNPsmO0OjPiVb=tNvrEp4iDmrXQMAGSrZ7ZwQw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <B6B0341B-A71E-4088-8D61-DE583440FD35@vangyzen.net> References: <ee5d23f3-44ff-c2aa-db5d-e1eb00b3b972@vangyzen.net> <B6B0341B-A71E-4088-8D61-DE583440FD35@vangyzen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:40 AM Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> wrote: > > Which architectures are still often built with an external toolchain? I'd= like to re-commit jemalloc 5.2.1. It was reverted because "compilation fa= ils for non-llvm-based platforms." I just built tinderbox worlds with 5.2.= 1 with no problems, albeit with llvm. There is another thread on -current recently, the simple anwser is: it's fine now. Please see: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2020-March/1950= 13.html On head, all the supported architectures are using clang/llvm, currently on CI only amd64 is building with xtoolchain gcc6. It's failing at the moment after new ncurses imported. My current plan is adding jobs for other architectures after we can this fixed, or it's just having more failing results. Best, Li-Wen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKBkRUwNmCbNbNPsmO0OjPiVb=tNvrEp4iDmrXQMAGSrZ7ZwQw>