Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 20:58:47 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [panic] netmap(4) and if_lagg(4) Message-ID: <5929CC67.4020508@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <59281DF8.20402@omnilan.de> References: <58CBCD7A.8060301@omnilan.de> <58CC23F5.7060507@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9iajZOUFsnWKdodN7zMvst8wn0xViM4xxEx%2B41jw_0B3g@mail.gmail.com> <58CFA394.8070901@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jf_VjcYUZynu5CXx-ps5z7PSxOky=QLpR-miqtxmMU5w@mail.gmail.com> <5926EE96.1010000@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9gcMD1QyG35p5UY8kz6n1kF%2B56Arz3q1T8HVBfMv3XN0w@mail.gmail.com> <5926F9F9.4040706@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9hripEStmfJhj_Q93OF5jFf2nfQXeuA2DnuSjBmJi6j4g@mail.gmail.com> <592701D6.7030301@omnilan.de> <592742A8.4010207@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jg-xXJpeyQkcFzA%2B-y=qbwROww2FRWzCN=dkmfkaQivQ@mail.gmail.com> <5927D560.10003@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jhDZ-Cnj8zyAcp=1dw=Q%2BZm2m%2BBkxK11x6Y%2BHLhX%2BrUg@mail.gmail.com> <5927D77A.60502@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9j%2BN5-2om2DETe0K1sAUPqDgwuNuNbF2F9St6C-YCKWQg@mail.gmail.com> <5927E974.6060706@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9gpKd1k2VJnzi=bE2Oy7LLUD=pxRCt9yS0nACB3YAX2Sw@mail.gmail.com> <5927EF05.9040208@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9gbPRYhVAftRTsNXVmzW23tkSOMXVbP4tU48hK--Zw%2BUg@mail.gmail.com> <59281DF8.20402@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 26.05.2017 14:22 (localtime): > Bezüglich Vincenzo Maffione's Nachricht vom 26.05.2017 11:06 (localtime): >> Yes, it should integrate and compile out of the box, I've done that >> several times with FreeBSD-11.0 and 10.3. > Impressive, it needed just a small addition to sys/conf/files to make > the linker happy :-) I perpared a diff to merge HEAD's netmap code to 11.1-prerelease for further tests (preferred over replacing stable/11 code with upstream clone, since there were some post-sync (r307394, 2016 Oct.) fixes, which I haven't check if they are FreeBSD specific or also included upstream). This hasn't changed anything regarding my problems (vale-ctl -a vale0:em0 not usable anymore: netmap_ring request size 65792 too large, panic when adding trying to add vale0:lagg0), but hopefully make things easier to narrow down the problems. If anybody else is interested in closer upstream netmap code on stable/11, here's the diff of the inofficial MFC: ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/misc/MFC-netmap-to-11.1-prerelease.diff I hope I found all related commits, but I've done by hand; no idea if there's a way to let svn do the same job... List of repspected revisions: r306772, r307394-r307396, r307569, r307572, r307574, r307703, r307706, r307728, r308000, r308038, r309306, r310822, r311045, r311986, r313747, r314915. No guarantee that I missed something! No tests regarding pt_netmap done yet, I just wanted to provide a better testing platfrom! -harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5929CC67.4020508>