Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:26:31 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/48095: Manual page for jail(8) does not mention mounting devfs under jail. Message-ID: <20030209212448.X866@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> In-Reply-To: <200302092050.h19KoEKx020142@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200302092050.h19KoEKx020142@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> # Jailed processes that need devices should have some sort of access
> # to /dev nodes when they are inside the jail, imho. It is then up to
> # the administrator to choose how to implement this. Either by
> # mounting devfs under the /jail/dev directory or by manually calling
> # MAKEDEV or mknod to create only those devices that are absolutely
> # necessary.
MAKEDEV has gone the way of the dodo in -current, so it shouldn't be
mentioned. I have successfully created devices in a chroot environment
with mknod in -current, and they survive reboot. I haven't tried it with a
jail yet though.
HTH,
Doug
--
"The last time France wanted more evidence, it rolled right
through Paris with a German flag." - David Letterman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030209212448.X866>