Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 01:34:11 -0500 (EST) From: Zippy <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who's maintaining the CTM tree? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903250127500.309-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9903251650060.8946-100000@bragg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I took this offline with Chuck Robey, but I'll repeat some of it here. This was my first time using ctm, so I pulled the deltas from ftp.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/CTM/src-3. I was hoping that this was the 3.1-STABLE track, so I built and installed (over my 3.1-RELEASE). Going through the deltas (just out of curiosity), I found this RELNOTES.TXT (in src-3.0057). I was concerned that either 1) I *wasn't* tracking -STABLE, as I had hoped, or 2) the CTM deltas were corrupted and couldn't be trusted. Add to this the fact that in my brainfried state this evening I was unintentionally rebuilding the kernel with the -RELEASE source trees, and I hope you can understand my concern (and forgive the original post to ctm-announce). So: was this a temporal anomaly, or am I tracking a super-secret 3.2-RELEASE? :) Or, (more likely), is this file intended to be in the 3.1-STABLE dist? Thanks, SB On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Zippy wrote: > > > The puzzling part, of course, is the version. 3.2-RELEASE? > > Freaky - sounds like some kind of temporal anomaly at work. Did you happen to > save the diffs between 3.1 and 3.2? It would save the developers a lot of work > :-) > > Kris > > ----- > The Feynman problem-solving algorithm: 1. Write down the problem > 2. Think real hard > 3. Write down the solution > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9903250127500.309-100000>