Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:52:10 -1000 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: nat and ipfw - divert or builtin Message-ID: <46F5FF0A.7030203@psg.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
freebsd-current i386 / soekris i used to use ipfw to divert to natd. so, when i went to configure a new nat box nat box today, i was 82.3% there when i hit a bunch of nat stuff in ipfw that i do not remember seeing before. it appears that ipfw will nat all on its own without natd and divert. what's the trade-off? which should i use? randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46F5FF0A.7030203>