Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jun 2001 01:15:04 -0500
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Pedro F Giffuni <pfg1+@pitt.edu>
Cc:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   WP's for FreeBSD (Was: Microsoft giving back to FreeBSD !!)
Message-ID:  <15165.28264.754600.976397@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <3B3D8FC5.C5366C3B@pitt.edu>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106271129170.46208-100000@heorot.1nova.com> <3B3A2E2F.A74DDCC8@pitt.edu> <3B3A2ECF.6FECA0E3@Silver-Lynx.com> <20010630061123.E20203@hades.hell.gr> <3B3D8FC5.C5366C3B@pitt.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pedro F Giffuni <pfg1+@pitt.edu> types:
> Even when I am aware that our linux emulator is excellent, I made up my
> personal excuse and I never buy commercial software for linux: A native
> port is always better because, as someone that has ported Linux stuff to
> FreeBSD, in the porting process new bugs are found. Having Linux users
> run with the first round of bug reports is OK with me too ;).

I'm not quite that strict about things - FreeBSD native is a feature I
look for, but don't require. If there is a large margin between Linux
commercial software and the FreeBSD native competition, I'd buy the
Linux binary. If there are no non-required features missing and the
two are otherwise close, I'll buy the FreeBSD version. Which is why I
would have been willing to buy Frame for Linux if Adobe would sell it
to me, but wound up buying Applixware Office for FreeBSD when Adobe
decided not they wouldn't do that.

> > Then support was dropped.  And it seemed to bring back all those dim
> I admit it blatantly... I didn't buy Applixware for FreeBSD because I
> heard it was not very good, and I'm hoping a native open office will
> appear someday. Wordperfect is a classic though... I would buy a FreeBSD
> native port, even considering the Linux one is available online.

Applixware 4.4.2 was ... I think annoying is the word. 5.0 is much
better. If you do lots of slides for overheads - well, that's the
weakest tool in the suite. On the other hand, if you think that, you
should check out <URL:
http://www.edwardtufte.com/1183729641/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00001B&topic_id=1&topic=Ask%20E%2eT%2e
> and then both <URL: http://www.norvig.com/Gettysburg/index.htm > and
<URL: http://www.norvig.com/Gettysburg/making.html >.

I've been using Applixware 5.0 for work for graduate school for the
last two semesters, and have been pleased with the results. You can
read my review of it at <URL:
http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/reviews/AO/ >, and of the word
processors I looked at for doing graduate work at <URL: <URL:
http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/reviews/FreeBSD-WP.html >.

	<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>			http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15165.28264.754600.976397>