Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 14:55:49 -0800 (PST) From: dima@FreeBSD.ORG (Dima Ruban) To: alk@Think.COM (Tony Kimball) Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: new sup server Message-ID: <199603212255.OAA22228@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199603212210.QAA00889@compound> from "Tony Kimball" at Mar 21, 96 04:10:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Kimball writes: > > > From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 11:54:05 -0800 > Subject: Re: new sup server > > I would suggest that we coordinate as follows, to avoid overloading the T1 > to freefall: > > This won't do as much good as it should, unless the mirrors work for > those as point at them. I mentioned this on -questions, but perhaps > it bears repeating, that *only* freefall is working for me > using the 2.1R client. I suspect the mirrors are running newer > versions of the server (although I have not investigated at length). > > sup -v sup5.current > SUP 8.26 (4.3 BSD) for file sup5.current at Mar 21 15:32:28 Probably you have to upgrade sup client? (to 9.x) > SUP: Read error on network: Connection reset by peer > SUP: Network write timed out > SUP Upgrade of src-base-current at Thu Mar 21 15:44:31 1996 > SUP: Error reading signon reply from fileserver > > Similarly sup2, sup3, while sup4 refuses connections with perfect > consistency to date. > -- dima
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603212255.OAA22228>