Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Morton Lin <mtlin1@ms36.hinet.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/foo/nut conflict ? Message-ID: <20030709125551.M4273@znfgre.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <002d01c3462a$a3a81be0$c40a27ca@morton> References: <002d01c3462a$a3a81be0$c40a27ca@morton>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Morton Lin wrote: > Hi, Sir : > > There were two named "nut" ports in the ports tree. I objected to this at the time, and was told it wasn't a big deal. > 1) ports/misc/nut/ > (from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html I saw > its name should be "health-nut-8.8" or something > like that ? ) > 2) ports/sysutils/nut/ > > Should we make some differences between them ? > > BTW, ports gd2 was already upgraded by maintainer. > Is there any plan to upgrade ports/sysutils/nut to fix > the "make cgi" broken problem? The last time I tried this with a new version, it still didn't work. They are releasing new versions of nut with a fairly high regularity, so I'm still trying them to find one that works. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030709125551.M4273>