Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:16:27 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
To:        ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com>
Cc:        Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= <decke@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: redports and build status
Message-ID:  <CAGwOe2b-2nAyjQgqSv88YJAvg=mp2Q6ErDQ3zeMVUcWR=jwREg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <17051586.gQbKyLmFOD@lumiwa.farms.net>
References:  <CAGwOe2bfPNknz=X_dHAmnJgVTM3F9huueZXwWr48yYOFY6BR9g@mail.gmail.com> <20140813123926.3354a660@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <CAGwOe2bABx-7zcfgR3Wj_6=ZFfHvFtf-oYggNs1NR5MjS1=SRg@mail.gmail.com> <17051586.gQbKyLmFOD@lumiwa.farms.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 August 2014 17:11:28 Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org> wrot=
e:
>> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:49:31 +0200 Bernhard Fr=C3=B6hlich wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org> wr=
ote:
>> >>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:38:27 +0200 Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote:
>> >>>> I built a port in redports and I received a mail notifying that the
>> >>>> builds were finished, but it seems redports couldn't figure out if =
the
>> >>>> builds finished successfully.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20140812170901-30860
>> >>>
>> >>> Any ideas of why this happened?
>> >>>
>> >>>> Thanks in advance.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm seeing a lot of these as well. CCing decke@
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, the "finished" state is some rescue state in case something wen=
t
>> >> terribly wrong. Usually this happens when something inside redports f=
ails
>> >> or some backend behaves very weird or if the port creates some very
>> >> strange
>> >> situation like a recursive dependency (which fills up a temporary
>> >> partition and then fails).
>> >>
>> >> If only one of many jobs fails then chances are good that it is some
>> >> redports weirdness. If many jobs fail (like in this case) and it is
>> >> reproducible then the chances are good that your port is doing someth=
ing
>> >> very very bad.
>> >
>> > I'm seeing these on multiple unrelated ports and with trivial changes.
>> > I've now cleared my redports tree, leaving only one unmodified port an=
d
>> > it still results in all 'finished'.  Maybe redport's internal ports tr=
ee
>> > got corrupt or one of its cached packages?
>>
>> Mine is modified but nothing to do with dependencies or such. However
>> this problem is reproducible. This is the port:
>>
>> https://redports.org/browser/fernape/lang/basic256?rev=3D30358
>>
>> I don't see very bad things there or at least not compared with the
>> previous revision which finished with "success"
>>
>> Can you think of anything I can try? I'm willing to help. I got used
>> to run successfully tests in redports to attach them to my PR's and I
>> don't want to update this port until it builds properly.
>>
>> Regards
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=3D22&t=3D44800&start=3D75

Sorry, but I don't see how that thread is related to this one...

>
> --
> ajtiM
> --------
> http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2b-2nAyjQgqSv88YJAvg=mp2Q6ErDQ3zeMVUcWR=jwREg>