Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:53:49 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: tom@hur.st, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, Randi Harper <randi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 8.x grudges Message-ID: <4C34E95D.5000903@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <779BFD8C-962A-4577-B794-6AE2B946F4DF@mac.com> References: <4C34C5DE.7040007@aldan.algebra.com> <20100707185928.GA16180@icarus.home.lan> <4C34E0E6.9070801@aldan.algebra.com> <AANLkTimdSWkgOYaSp-sWVd2fHtjv65zEVCJIT6mHlNC5@mail.gmail.com> <779BFD8C-962A-4577-B794-6AE2B946F4DF@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
07.07.2010 16:50, Marcel Moolenaar ΞΑΠΙΣΑΧ(ΜΑ):
> Not to mention that if you change uart(4) to create dev entries like sio(4)
> after uart(4) has been in the tree for more than 6 years creating ttyu*
> entries, you actually introduce a gratuitous change.
>
If sio and uart could co-exist, then you'd be right. But sio no longer
builds under 8.x, so some kind of aliasing (either by uart itself or by
devfs) would be useful.
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C34E95D.5000903>