Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:12:09 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: fenner@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs Message-ID: <yged63rlgh2.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org> References: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 >>>>> Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> said: bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. bms> The PRs in question are: bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 bms> What does everyone else think? Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6 support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively. So, I think it is better to integrate tcp_wrappers into our tree rather than maintaining it in contrib like NetBSD does. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yged63rlgh2.wl%ume>