Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:12:47 +0100
From:      Henrik Brix Andersen <henrik@brixandersen.dk>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/usb ukbd.c usb_quirks.c usb_quirks.h usbdevs
Message-ID:  <20061128231247.GB73497@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20061128224915.GA38469@rambler-co.ru>
References:  <200611282113.kASLD8vu090754@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061128220111.GA71168@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <20061128220529.GA38107@rambler-co.ru> <20061128222641.GA73497@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <20061128224915.GA38469@rambler-co.ru>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:49:15AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:26:41PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:05:29AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Why can't you just check for the defined constant?
> > 
> > To clarify: it is a run-time issue, not a compile-time issue. The
> > application will compile fine regardless of the above patch, but
> > without the above patch (and with ukbd/uhid loaded) the application
> > will fail to attach to the device.
> > 
> You want to build a port only when you know that the kernel has
> this fix?

That is my intention, yes. Otherwise end-users will likely be confused
as to why the application fails to detect their device.

Regards,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <henrik@brixandersen.dk>

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: GnuPG signed

iD8DBQFFbMJvv+Q4flTiePgRApBoAKCD7fjKsVFHaGvwLJX92AruNvyHHACfUChw
7i1Zk4K7Cp4vJ2nOstJP5CU=
=86uj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061128231247.GB73497>