Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:12:08 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Sydney Meyer <meyer.sydney@googlemail.com>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ath (AR9280) with nanoBSD Message-ID: <20160630190829.N11465@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmom%2ByEKdV5WAUe_3Ww1kPvT1g8bEfv6CXXVeFdNnqfp8aQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <C5CC5FDC-F345-4B2E-A382-0BC7BEAC776F@googlemail.com> <CAJ-Vmom%2ByEKdV5WAUe_3Ww1kPvT1g8bEfv6CXXVeFdNnqfp8aQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:51:40 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > It's there, it just doesn't show up in ifconfig anymore. > > sysctl net.wlan.devices > > if you create the interface (ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ath0) then > it'll show up! Just curious .. why was it considered a good idea not to have ifconfig show wireless interfaces? Won't this make for ongoing such confusion? cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160630190829.N11465>