Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 10:38:47 -0700 From: Aaron Seelye <aseelye@urx.com> To: Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au>, Diffie <diffie@blazebox.homeip.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about squid. Message-ID: <200208251038.47639.aseelye@urx.com> In-Reply-To: <20020825235354.I75710-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> References: <20020825235354.I75710-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Which is why the squid guys run their benchmarks with squid configured to use around 50% max fs space. Aaron On Sunday 25 August 2002 06:55 am, Andrew wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Diffie wrote: > > /kernel: /usr/local/squid: optimization changed from TIME to SPACE > > From tunefs(8): > > The filesystem can either try to minimize the time spent allocating > blocks, or it can attempt to minimize the space fragmentation on the disk. > Optimization for space has much higher overhead for file writes. The > kernel normally changes the preference automatically as the percent > fragmentation changes on the filesystem. > > Andrew > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208251038.47639.aseelye>