Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:34:06 +0200
From:      Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Cc:        Henrik Brix Andersen <henrik@brixandersen.dk>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk
Message-ID:  <46B7072E.8070307@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070806113855.0fcq213io0www04k@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <200706281553.l5SFr56i099807@repoman.freebsd.org>	<20070802181715.46yikycm8gc8g8kk@webmail.leidinger.net>	<20070803125410.GB1062@tirith.brixandersen.dk>	<200708032144.57558.lofi@freebsd.org>	<20070803204215.GA68620@rot26.obsecurity.org>	<20070806074318.q9mw6ulngg00gwsw@webmail.leidinger.net>	<20070806065634.GA31676@rot26.obsecurity.org> <20070806113855.0fcq213io0www04k@webmail.leidinger.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Alexander Leidinger schrieb:
> Kris, what technical reasons are against explicit dependencies, in
> your opinion? 
Explicit dependencies would be great, if they can be guaranteed to be
correct, which basically means we need a way auto-generate them. Maybe
this could be done in a similar way to the security check target - run
ldd/objdump over installed executables and libraries, record symbol
names somewhere, determine dependencies by comparing records ...

Explicit dependencies that need to be determined and maintained manually
by port maintainers are useless, since they'll be almost guaranteed to
be wrong most of the time for those ports that would profit the most
(shave off the most implicit dependencies) from having them.

Cheers,
-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org



[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtwcxXhc68WspdLARAgcDAJ4vBJl8c5dOC40ZyOUDbRDHcGLiMQCgiaL8
LjjQ/iFvzcrfVcFCSJUnW3o=
=s+iV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46B7072E.8070307>