Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 03:25:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net bridge.c Message-ID: <20050704032415.W21939@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20050704075119.GA11500@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <200507031824.j63IO3Bs009536@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050703184013.U21939@odysseus.silby.com> <20050703235733.GA8138@heff.fud.org.nz> <20050704005749.D21939@odysseus.silby.com> <20050704075119.GA11500@heff.fud.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Andrew Thompson wrote: >> The other protocol stacks need aligned headers too, that's why I'm curious >> as to the bridge-specificness of this patch. > > Because I have only made a handful of commits so far and they were all > to if_bridge, so im a little narrow minded at the moment ;-) > > If there is a better way to do this im all for it. > > > Andrew I apologize for jumping down your throat, you walked into a discussion that started a few weeks ago, then went into hiatus... and now you've resurrected it. :) There was some discussion as to whether alignment was the driver's job, the ethernet layer's job, or the protocl layer's job. :) Your code should be fine until we come to a consensus on what to do. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050704032415.W21939>