Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:26:33 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Big physically contiguous mbuf clusters Message-ID: <21225.32793.237629.329516@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomC5Ge3JwfUsgMrJ_rGqiYxfxR4wWzn5A-KAu7HBsueMw@mail.gmail.com> References: <21225.20047.947384.390241@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <CAJ-VmomC5Ge3JwfUsgMrJ_rGqiYxfxR4wWzn5A-KAu7HBsueMw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:21:21 -0800, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> said: > For servers with lots of memory we could then keep these around and > only dip into them for temporary allocations (eg not VM pages that may > be held for some unknown amount of time.) mbufs may also be held for some unknown amout of time, so I don't think that helps at all. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21225.32793.237629.329516>