Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:40:35 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd(8) doesn't work in 10 and CURRENT (does auromound(8) support NFS?) Message-ID: <1021530859.20140419104035@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <F19EAE86-4822-4C22-9152-CB81A02E4C2F@FreeBSD.org> References: <1172266612.20140418191203@serebryakov.spb.ru> <F19EAE86-4822-4C22-9152-CB81A02E4C2F@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Edward. You wrote 19 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2014 =E3., 1:59:08: >> Does new "automound(8)", which "compatible with its counterparts in OS = X, >> Solaris, and Linux" support NFS? ETN> Well, it would be kind of pointless if it didn't, right? ;-) Why not? As far as I understand, removable storage (USB sticks, all assortment of cards and cardreaders, optical discs, external USB HDD enclosures and things like this) is much more frequent than NFS in these days :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1021530859.20140419104035>