Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:40:35 +0400
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
To:        =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: amd(8) doesn't work in 10 and CURRENT (does auromound(8) support NFS?)
Message-ID:  <1021530859.20140419104035@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <F19EAE86-4822-4C22-9152-CB81A02E4C2F@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <1172266612.20140418191203@serebryakov.spb.ru> <F19EAE86-4822-4C22-9152-CB81A02E4C2F@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Edward.
You wrote 19 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2014 =E3., 1:59:08:

>>  Does new "automound(8)", which "compatible with its counterparts in OS =
X,
>> Solaris, and Linux" support NFS?
ETN> Well, it would be kind of pointless if it didn't, right?  ;-)
 Why not? As far as I understand, removable storage (USB sticks, all
assortment of cards and cardreaders, optical discs, external USB HDD
enclosures and things like this) is much more frequent than NFS in these
days :)

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1021530859.20140419104035>