Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
To:        Damian Hamill <damian@cablenet.net>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SMTP gateway clients
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.3.95.970425111858.4465A-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <3360C297.3F54BC7E@cablenet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Damian Hamill wrote:

> Steve wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 24 Apr 1997, Jason Fesler wrote:
> > 
> > > At 10:53 AM 4/24/97 -0400, Steve wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Anyone know how to support smtp gateways without a static IP on the
> > > >client's end?
> 
> > > As to *really* doing  SMTP to a dynamic IP, er.. ya, right.
> 
> We've been doing that successfully for the last 2 years.
> 

How do you do it?

> > I thought so - but I had to take a shot in case I was living in the dark
> > or something.  A competitor who had the world convinced he was the
> > largest, supported dialup SMTP.  of course this was because in reality he
> > had 32 lines and didnt have the class C boundary crossing problems
> > associated with having hundreds of lines.
> 
> I don't see what this has to do with it. What problems are associated
> with crossing Class C boundaries ?

I have annex4000 term servers.  I can set a dedicated IP to a user, but if
they connect on a term server in a different class C they get the IP but
there is no route to it.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.970425111858.4465A-100000>