Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:37:42 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: patch for www/tools/portsgrowth/* Message-ID: <1124383062.56327.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050819.011412.71559878.hrs@allbsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hiroki Sato píše v pá 19. 08. 2005 v 01:14 +0900: > Hi, > > A plot of the number of ports/packages available in > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/growth/status.png was based on > the number of lines in ports/INDEX, but I think another > source is needed because the ports/INDEX in the CVS repository > is obsolete now. > > I made a patch[*] to make a plot from the number of lines in > CVSROOT-ports/modules instead, but I am not sure if this is > reasonable. Any comments? > > [*] http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/portsgrowth.diff > > A generated plot is available here: > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/status.png I think it's the best source available with a history. You could go check for ports count on FreshPorts, or download index from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/INDEX.gz, but these sources don't have a handy history which CVS/modules got. The numbers should be accurate as long as you don't forget to substract leading 56 lines, and ports_* lines which stands for categories. -- Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> And now something completely different. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDBLlWntdYP8FOsoIRAuItAJ0UbA6OTnZ2E9lP/n+Bwsr6ouoKdACfWJoy swl+gc4058H7+sBTa0xlVZY= =Nrfo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1124383062.56327.2.camel>