Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:12:24 -0600 From: Tim <tim@sleepy.wojomedia.com> To: Stuart Krivis <ipswitch@apk.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: qmail (Was: Maintaining Access Control Lists ) Message-ID: <20020328151224.GA21955@sleepy.wojomedia.com> In-Reply-To: <nho5auop04lj1kobge0oigg25cfk7baupp@4ax.com> References: <p05101505b8c430e28572@[10.0.1.9]> <000c01c1d3ab$6d2c6960$6600a8c0@penguin> <p05101509b8c47b17d088@[10.0.1.8]> <nuv4auodvqdjhmsak77hah18lp615k9e4e@4ax.com> <20020328024844.GA12709@sleepy.wojomedia.com> <nho5auop04lj1kobge0oigg25cfk7baupp@4ax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That was mostly tongue-in-cheek. I am not going to get into an argument about what constitutes brilliant software. If *you* think any piece of software is brilliant, good for you. I shall quote you: <shrug> Use what works well for you and move on to the next task. Tim On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:41:14AM -0500, Stuart Krivis wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:48:44 -0600, Tim <tim@sleepy.wojomedia.com> > wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:45:47PM -0500, Stuart Krivis wrote: > >> <shrug> Use what works well for you and move on to the next task. > > > >That's what 99% of us do. The other 1% writes brilliant software or > >bitches about other people doing it. ;-) > > Brilliant software? Re-inventing the wheel just for the sake of > re-inventing is not brilliant. Requiring the world to conform to your > ideas is not brilliant. > > Just as an example, tcp wrappers is brilliant software. It does > exactly what is needed and it also plugs right in to the way you were > already doing things. Ssh was/is also brilliant software. Ditto for > the shadow password suite. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020328151224.GA21955>