Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:25:12 +0100 From: Markus Gebert <markus.gebert@hostpoint.ch> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org>, George Mamalakis <mamalos@eng.auth.gr> Subject: Re: chflags on zfs (sappnd) Message-ID: <6B9C30FF-784E-46FF-ADE8-2C574391371C@hostpoint.ch> In-Reply-To: <4CE4264C.7050207@freebsd.org> References: <4CE3B320.70302@eng.auth.gr> <DCEDCE25-4F26-4FB9-B16E-8EA83F75FB51@hostpoint.ch> <4CE4264C.7050207@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17.11.2010, at 20:00, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 17/11/2010 18:38 Markus Gebert said the following: >> >> On 17.11.2010, at 11:49, George Mamalakis wrote: >> >>> Hi everbody, >>> >>> from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS I understand that chflags are supported by zfs. But if I have a file with sappnd on a zfs filesystem, I am unable to execute a command like this: >>> >>> # touch lili >>> # chflags sappnd lili >>> # ls -lrto lili >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel sappnd 5 Nov 17 12:38 lili >>> # echo "lala" >> lili >>> # echo "lala" >> lili >>> -su: echo: write error: Operation not permitted >>> >>> So, the first time it worked, but it stops working on any consequent time (when the file is no more empty). >>> I found a bug report on: >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149495 >> >> And: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151082&cat=kern >> >> >>> where a patch is suggested. Nevertheless, even though my sources are newer than the suggested patch, my source tree does not contain it. >>> Do we know anything more about it? >> >> The fix was committed to CURRENT on Oct 8th (r213634). The commit message talks about MFC after a week, however to me it looks like the fix hasn't made it to 8-STABLE yet. >> >> Also, there seems to be a related commit r213673 which essentially reverts r213634 and has a more general approach to handling ioflags with zfs. This commit was on Oct 10th, again 1 week MFC grace period, again not in 8-STABLE yet, at least to my knowlegde. >> >> Maybe MFC was simply forgotten, maybe there's a good reason to delay it, I don't know. We're using my patch (the one mentioned in the PRs) for now and append-only works as intended. Applying the changes in r213673 to 8-STABLE might be an option too, if you're considering patching to get the append flag working. >> >> Anyway, hopefully one of these fixes gets MFCd to 8-STABLE soon. >> > > Good analysis, but did you forget to CC the committer(s)? > It is known that sometimes the committers do need a gentle (or not so) nudging :-) Right :-) mm@ and pjd@ now CCed. Markus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6B9C30FF-784E-46FF-ADE8-2C574391371C>