Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:32:32 -0500 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <20030701183232.A24088@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030701232038.GJ70590@roark.gnf.org>; from gordont@gnf.org on Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:20:38PM -0700 References: <200307012310.h61NAdTh080109@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030701181836.A23301@FreeBSD.org> <20030701232038.GJ70590@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> [ Date: 2003-07-01 ] [ w.r.t. Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ] > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:18:36PM -0500, Juli Mallett wrote: > > * Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org> [ Date: 2003-07-01 ] > > [ w.r.t. cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ] > > > gordon 2003/07/01 16:10:39 PDT > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > . Makefile.inc1 > > > Log: > > > Switch the logic on the /rescue bits from NO_RESCUE to RESCUE, at least > > > until there is a fix for cross building available. > > > > Maybe WANT_RESCUE? > > It should be temporary enough, but what is the policy for the opposite of > NO_*? I know ports use WANT_*, does src generally use the same thing? WITH_LIBMAP is the only readily available example I can think of. Hmm. Also, in the src tree we tend to spell things NO<foo> as in NOLIBTHR, and so on. I don't know if there is a style rule for this, but consistency is nice. I am sure there are similar things in MAkefile.inc1. -- juli mallett. email: jmallett@freebsd.org; efnet: juli; aim: bsdflata; i have lost my way home early - i don't care cause i won't stay there.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030701183232.A24088>