Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:11:55 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r192351 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <4A12E85B.7050107@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200905190819.12407.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200905182234.n4IMYifY077079@svn.freebsd.org> <200905190819.12407.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 18 May 2009 6:34:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> Author: bz >> Date: Mon May 18 22:34:44 2009 >> New Revision: 192351 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/192351 >> >> Log: >> Revert the logical change of r192341. >> >> net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass is a classic ip_input.c variable and is used in >> the pfil and bridge code as well. As ipfw is loadable we need to always >> provide it. That is the reason why it lives in struct vnet_inet and >> not in struct vnet_ipfw. > > Gah, I had thought I had seen it in vnet_ipfw when adding default_to_accept > (as at first I had looked into making default_to_accept per-image but > tunables + VIMAGE don't mix). we need to look at this.. what does it MEAN to have a tunable and multiple images? my guess is that normal tunables are only valid for teh base image, but that one might have a way to set the 'tunables' for one's child images.. possibly by setting them in one's environment? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A12E85B.7050107>