Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:52:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Isabell Long <issyl0@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-doc-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-doc-all@FreeBSD.org>, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org>, "doc-committers@FreeBSD.org" <doc-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r38908 - head/share/sgml Message-ID: <4FC6887E.6070903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120530154513.GA1796@sky.issyl0.co.uk> References: <201205271335.q4RDZgtk051773@svn.freebsd.org> <4FC29C2B.70405@FreeBSD.org> <1338382465.65409.63.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20120530154513.GA1796@sky.issyl0.co.uk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 5/30/2012 8:45 AM, Isabell Long wrote:
> On 30 May 2012, at 13:54, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 14:27 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 05/27/2012 06:35, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>>>> + <description>The Bangladeshi FreeBSD User Group is a group of the FreeBSD
>>>
>>> Would &os; be appropriate here as well?
>>
>> Now I've already made the commit though, I'm not sure it is worth
>> touching that line again (especially when the rest of the file uses
>> almost none of our entities).
>
> Why not completely fix it? Surely there's no point leaving the whole
> file imperfect and having the same discussion in six months time when
> others notice?
>
> (I realise that I may have just volunteered myself for the task...)
Since Isabell already volunteered I feel safe in saying that my
preference is towards repo-churn that leads to a more complete solution
as well. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC6887E.6070903>