Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 14:22:11 -0400 (EDT) From: "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> To: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: FreeBSD hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971022142133.15884B-100000@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> In-Reply-To: <19971022190225.DV50844@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Oct 1997, J Wunsch wrote: > As Jamil J. Weatherbee wrote: > > > > > This was sent to me recently... It seems to be a pretty serious hole > > > > in open() and permissions... > > > > > > Fixed. > > > > How exactly did you fix it, this is related to what I was saying about > > opening a file as RD_ONLY and WR_ONLY, ... > > Yep, this was in the same boat. The way the fix works, only one of > O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, or O_RDWR should be possible now, and anything > else should be rejected as EINVAL. I thought that O_RDRW = O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY. -- David Cross ACS Consultant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971022142133.15884B-100000>