Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 21:03:36 +0100 (MET) From: j@uriah.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: gj@pcs.dec.com@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: using procfs for debugging Message-ID: <199501122003.VAA19592@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> In-Reply-To: <m0rSLxf-0005M7C@rks32.pcs.dec.com> from "Gary Jennejohn" at Jan 12, 95 10:36:00 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Gary Jennejohn wrote:
|
| BTW J"org, I was planning to try and hack your mods into gdb-4.13 for
| dyadic frames, but if you _really_ want to do it....:-)
Hmm, i'm not eager to dig into problems where i don't have a clue
of:-) Actually, i've already looked and found that this is easy and
not easy. Easy since there are already hooks (SETUP_ARBITRARY_FRAME),
not easy since it looks that it's a designer's decision by now whether
an architecture does require two args to the `frame' command or if a
single arg will suffice. So if we'd use SETUP_ARBITRARY_FRAME the way
it's used by now, we'll prohibit the traditional way the frame command
used to work...
Did i overlook something?
--
cheers, J"org work: --- no longer ---
private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501122003.VAA19592>