Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:22:11 +0200 From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: dillon@apollo.backplane.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Our routed - Vern says it's old and buggy. Message-ID: <67281.925327331@verdi.nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT)" References: <199904281914.MAA08534@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I consider ISIS dead these days, though I'm sure there are people who > still swear by it. As far as I know, there is *active* development of IS-IS these days, see for instance: "IS-IS Optimized Multipath (ISIS-OMP)", Tony Li, Curtis Villamizar, 02/23/1999, <draft-ietf-isis-omp-01.txt,.ps> "IS-IS extensions for Traffic Engineering", Tony Li, Henk Smit, 02/02/1999, <draft-ietf-isis-traffic-00.txt> "L1/L2 Optimal IS-IS Routing", Antoni Przygienda, Ajay Patel, 02/19/1999, <draft-ietf-isis-l1l2-00.txt> "Domain-wide Prefix Distribution with Multi-Level IS-IS", Tony Li, 02/26/1999, <draft-ietf-isis-domain-wide-00.txt> Tony Li (Juniper, ex Cisco) is the head of this particular working group. Also, it's used by some rather big backbone providers. PS: No, this is not meant to start a flame war/discussion about the merits and demerits of various routing protocols. We use OSPF as an IGP ourselves. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?67281.925327331>