Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:52:44 -0600 From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>, "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, smp@csn.net, opsys@mail.webspan.net, jak@cetlink.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <19980303105244.26509@right.PCS> In-Reply-To: <199803031604.JAA29061@mt.sri.com>; from Nate Williams on Mar 03, 1998 at 09:04:05AM -0700 References: <199803030519.WAA26387@mt.sri.com> <Pine.SV4.3.95.980303143444.3809A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> <199803031604.JAA29061@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 03, 1998 at 09:04:05AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: > > ODI's ObjectStore is faster than Oracle, Sybase, or Informix. Much > > faster. > > We've demo'd ObjectStore, and because of the 'one-process per DB' > locking they have, it's basically useless. (And, the much faster we've > not seen either.) IIRC, U.Wisconsin attempted to benchmark several OO Database engines, and they ended up in a big argument with ODI. If I understand it correctly, the 007 benchmark did not show ODI performing very well, and ODI was claiming that the UW researchers showed bias in their benchmarks. See ftp://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/oo7/sigmod.ps -- Jonathan (who has no affiliation with the DB project at UW Madison) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980303105244.26509>