Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:24:29 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: green@FreeBSD.ORG, schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Still kernel compilation failures Message-ID: <199907230424.OAA01541@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > Put -O back in the COPTFLAGS. >> >> It works now. Is there any explaination why -O is required? :) > >Noone compiles without -O, so(/and) it's not supported. My take is It is supported, but someone broke it. >that EGCS says "Hey, I am in optimization level foobar! I can optimize >for unused code. Hmm... that's unused, so...". Either that or its >debugging support is really uNFed up. -O works because optimisation removes an unused reference to a nonexistent variable. The variable once existed and was used. It still exists under a different name. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907230424.OAA01541>