Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 01:35:38 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Marko =?koi8-r?Q?Cupa'c?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: recommended poudriere jail versions? Message-ID: <20151002223538.GD3158@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20151001103206.2d2603a4@efreet.kappastar.com> References: <20151001103206.2d2603a4@efreet.kappastar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Marko Cupa'c wrote: > Hi, > > what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So > far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor > version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended > up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to > rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is > starting to take too much of my time. > > I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per > architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built > on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for > 10.2-<latestpathclevel> on 10.1-<nopatches>? Some packages (freeradius, for example) strict depends from openssl version. Different openssl version in base (in jail and in target) stop to run this application. opensssl version in base can be changed by patchlevel too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151002223538.GD3158>