Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:26:28 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: "IT Department, AkNet ISP" <info@aknet.kg> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Netmap-ipfw, how to fill a table by 15K entries ? Message-ID: <CA%2BhQ2%2BiXTtSVSH2LuMfhvN=3i7EPC0QECHFgrHsZr3jrptpShA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c572a9bd9df271142eb091ed47116433@aknet.kg> References: <20141223130201.83220.333300601.swift@crm.aknet.kg> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bhckawj=agT-KPJ8un%2BQ9%2B%2B4iYtM0YeYd2xL13PKXjK3w@mail.gmail.com> <c572a9bd9df271142eb091ed47116433@aknet.kg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:04 PM, <info@aknet.kg> wrote: > Dear Luigi > > Today I installed the last distribution of FreeBSD-Stable 10.1 and > took netmap-ipfw from your place by: > > git clone https://code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ > (hope the latest version) > i am investigating the problem. First, the "next" branch seems to behave marginally better in terms of robustness, but it still shows entries being inserted exactly every 100 ms which looks like the effect of some timeout (tipfw/ipfw and ./kipfw communicate through a tcp socket, tcpdump shows that the ack is delayed by 100ms which slows down everything. Need to investigate which tcp sockoptions remove this delay.. cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BhQ2%2BiXTtSVSH2LuMfhvN=3i7EPC0QECHFgrHsZr3jrptpShA>