Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 18:07:44 +0000 From: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml Message-ID: <20011102180743.A36151@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20011101211547.U9608@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <200110312326.f9VNQ4O00103@freefall.freebsd.org> <72962.1004605004@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <20011101211547.U9608@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Moved this to -doc since it's more appropriate to discuss the proposed changes there :) On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:15:48PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20011101 10:00], Sheldon Hearn (sheldonh@starjuice.net) wrote: > > > > > >On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:26:04 PST, Chern Lee wrote: > > > >> * manpages -> man pages > > > >This is an odd change. > > Yes it is. Consensus was to use: manual pages and not shorten it in any > way, since a: man page, would be a page about a man. :) I've uploaded at http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/diff a set of files that change all the articles to use `manual page' instead of `manpage'. Look for diff.000.* -> diff.008.* files. If it seems ok and we want to standardize on `manual page' instead of manpage, I think I can have the books/ later tonight too. What does everyone think about this? -giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011102180743.A36151>