Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:55:49 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Berger <peterb@telerama.lm.com> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 (or more) LAN interface on SAME subnet ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951219145139.3588A-100000@ivory.lm.com> In-Reply-To: <9512191945.AA15941@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I'm not enlightened yet. Here's my netstat -ni and routing table. Note that I haven't figured out why tun0 is being picked up as a /16 network when I specify it as a /24 in ppp.conf and sysconfig. If I ifconfig the netmask to be correct, everything still works. I guess what I'm really asking here is "Given that I have a /24 allocated to me and routing through the netblazer, what does the "correct" solution look lie? Would I need to give the PPP link an address on 147.72.1?" peterb% netstat -ni Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll ep0 1500 <Link>00.60.8c.f2.92.2d 1 0 3 0 0 ep0 1500 147.72.56 147.72.56.1 1 0 3 0 0 lo0 16384 <Link> 3 0 3 0 0 lo0 16384 127 127.0.0.1 3 0 3 0 0 ppp0* 1500 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0 tun0 1500 <Link> 16003 0 14913 0 0 tun0 1500 147.72 147.72.56.1 16003 0 14913 0 0 peterb% netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 147.72.1.2 UGc 2 0 tun0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 3 lo0 147.72 147.72.1.2 UGc 12 2 tun0 147.72.1.2 147.72.56.1 UH 6 0 tun0 147.72.56 link#1 UC 1 0 147.72.56.1 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 224 link#1 UCS 0 0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.951219145139.3588A-100000>