Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:48:16 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, chuckr@picnic.mat.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Our routed - Vern says it's old and buggy. Message-ID: <199904281948.NAA10488@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199904281914.MAA08534@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904281432380.378-100000@picnic.mat.net> <67008.925326749@verdi.nethelp.no> <199904281914.MAA08534@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> :> I can't quite figure why they stuck the word "open" in there, because it > :> couldn't possibly be more open than RIP. > : > :Probably because it was (at the time) in heavy "competition" with the OSI > :IS-IS routing protocol. Those standards were *not* openly available. (I > :believe they are now.) > : > :Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no > > I consider ISIS dead these days, though I'm sure there are people who > still swear by it. And some who swear *at* it still. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904281948.NAA10488>