Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 20:33:42 +0100 From: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer) To: lenzi@cwbone.bsi.COM.BR Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quality of BSD software Message-ID: <9603191933.AA13950@wavehh.hanse.de> References: <Chameleon.960318142126.petera@peterapc.bristol.com> <Pine.BSF.3.91.960319111413.4593A-100000@lenzi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
lenzi@cwbone.bsi.COM.BR (Lenzi, Sergio) wrote: >In an answer from a request for information about Win/U here is what >they sad: >> >> Thank you for your interest in Wind/U, which enables you to take >> your Windows applications to multiple Unix and VMS platforms >> with only a single source required. >> >> We do not support Linux or FreeBSD, primarily due to the > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> quality of the compilers that work with these operating systems. >I am very satisfyed with the quality of the BSD compilers and operating >system. In fact I think it is better than SCO or UNIXWARE compilers that >has bugs in the libc. >Can someone please evaluate this and perhaps convince the Win/U that >BSD has "quality" compilers??? Is this C++ toolkit? In that case, I wouldn't say that gcc is one of the better compilers and I think this should not be pretended. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de> - Fax +49 40 522 85 36 BSD User Group Hamburg, Germany http://www.bik-gmbh.de/~cracauer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9603191933.AA13950>