Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 07:52:44 -0400 From: Randall Hopper <rhh@ct.picker.com> To: Conrad Sabatier <conrads@neosoft.com>, Chris Dillon <cdillon@tri-lakes.net> Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AWE32 Message-ID: <19970807075244.18541@ct.picker.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970802181404.conrads@neosoft.com>; from Conrad Sabatier on Sat, Aug 02, 1997 at 06:14:04PM -0500 References: <19970802110825.42121@ct.picker.com> <XFMail.970802181404.conrads@neosoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Conrad Sabatier: |On 02-Aug-97 Randall Hopper wrote: |> |>Build a new kernel with: |> |> controller snd0 |> device pas0 at isa? port 0x388 irq 10 drq 3 vector pasintr |> device sb0 at isa? port 0x220 irq 5 drq 1 vector sbintr |> device sbxvi0 at isa? drq 5 |> device sbmidi0 at isa? port 0x330 |> device opl0 at isa? port 0x388 |> device awe0 at isa? port 0x620 | |Just wondering, why use the pas device for a Soundblaster? And won't it |conflict with the opl device? | Chris Dillon: |I was wondering the same thing. :) Sorry, the pas0 line is of course not needed for SB cards. I have an old 486 with a PAS card in it, and just leave that line in so I only have to build one kernel for both boxes. Each system correctly probes and notices the absense of the pas (or sb) devices--no manual disabling of devices req'd. No conflict with opl. Randall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970807075244.18541>