Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 22:48:25 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ticso@cicely.de, ticso@cicely12.cicely.de Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI bus numbering and orphaned devices Message-ID: <20030609.224825.78717109.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030610022706.GI509@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20030609165838.32044@hydrogen.funkthat.com> <20030610022706.GI509@cicely12.cicely.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <20030610022706.GI509@cicely12.cicely.de>
Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
: On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:58:38PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
: > Hello,
: >
: > I've recently started work on making FreeBSD work better on a sparc64
: > box that a friend has. It's a Netra AX1105-500 (UltraSPARC-IIe 500MHz).
: >
: > So far I have found out that the pci bus numbering has problems. We
: > don't attach pci busses as they are numbered in the bridge/OFW info.
: > This causes problems with pciconf -l and pciconf -{w,r} not agreeing.
: > It isn't too hard to tie down the busses to make pciconf agree with
: > itself.
I have similar issues with cardbus cards...
...
: > Of course the correct way to fix it would be to mirror the OFW tree,
: > and then probe any devices that exist in the OFW tree, but not in our
: > device tree.
why is this the correct way to fix it? don't mean to be difficult,
just don't see why sparc64 needs to eb different.
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030609.224825.78717109.imp>