Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:21:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca (Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group), jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), nik@FreeBSD.ORG (Nik Clayton), arch@FreeBSD.ORG, papowell@astart.com Subject: Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Message-ID: <200006231721.KAA25921@usr01.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <19530.961753945@localhost> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jun 23, 2000 02:52:25 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > He said GNU and Artistic licences. > > ^^^ > > I took that to mean no choice. > > No, you have a choice of either one. You can take LPRng under > the GPL or you can take it under the Artistic license. It is > dual-licensed. We would, of course, choose the artistic license. So you would be OK with this, if the purely GPL NLS code (gettext) was removed from LPRng, right? I think the GPL-only portions of the code are what he's objecting to, not the Artistic Licensed code. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006231721.KAA25921>