Date: 8 Jan 2016 08:57:51 +0000 From: "Mark Delany" <c2h@romeo.emu.st> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? Message-ID: <20160108085751.10132.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonYPhcN-gikuYQU_k5GaTAqTijoxR_0ORV4BZqsHMRJSg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20160104210741.32812.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net> <CAP=KkTwfpjec2Tgnm4PRR3u8t4GEqN9Febm5HRcqapifBG-B6g@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh4NNz9tgSpjJdv7fXteq5tAR7o3LvjV=u08NHjRLPwmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP=KkTzFUDsZwDDLD3n97xJW0qLVZMPduZGSX%2BeXC3UuLpVjMg@mail.gmail.com> <20160107161213.GZ3625@kib.kiev.ua> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bg6OB3MmZrW5hzNSnkcqKaKf1XGDraHfWXtSrowxKuL5g@mail.gmail.com> <20160107192840.GF3625@kib.kiev.ua> <20160108172323.W1815@besplex.bde.org> <20160108075815.3243.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net> <CAJ-VmonYPhcN-gikuYQU_k5GaTAqTijoxR_0ORV4BZqsHMRJSg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08Jan16, Adrian Chadd allegedly wrote: > On 7 January 2016 at 23:58, Mark Delany <c2h@romeo.emu.st> wrote: > I'm there, on 16 threads. That's intriquing. On CURRENT? You must be doing smarter than 16 * recvmsg() or 16 * select(). What's the thread structure? > I'd rather we do it on two or three, as a lot of time is wasted in > producer/consumer locking. but yeah, 500k tx/rx should be doable per > CPU with only locking changes. Locking changes in user space or kernel space? Mark.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160108085751.10132.qmail>