Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:15:13 +0800 From: Kevin Foo <chflags@gmail.com> To: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regression in atkbd? Message-ID: <25cb30909152315v64373073hb1273b9736e81212@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <179b97fb0909100709t33d372dfre14d00e93a935bcb@mail.gmail.com> References: <25cb30907080133l656fb10s6221607f00b3d193@mail.gmail.com> <179b97fb0909100709t33d372dfre14d00e93a935bcb@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> wrote: > > What does your /boot/loader.conf look like? > > I had a similar issue when: > > 1. booting GENERIC kernel but without debugging and WITNESS compiled in > > and > > 2. my /boot/loader.conf contained the leftover entry 'ukbd_load="YES"' > from when I was using my custom, modular kernel > > If either one of those or both was not true, I was able to boot as > usual. Strange. I never investigated any further... > > -Brandon > /boot/loader.conf contains only these:- snd_hda_load="YES" if_ndis_load="YES" Anyway, after a few tests, I never investigate further as the box is running happily with amd64 7-STABLE. Strange indeed. -- Regards Kevin Foo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25cb30909152315v64373073hb1273b9736e81212>