Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:53:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Steve Polyack <korvus@comcast.net>, bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us, User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client goes into infinite retry loop Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1003221942200.20197@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4BA3613F.4070606@comcast.net> <201003221200.41607.jhb@freebsd.org> <4BA79E54.5030504@comcast.net> <201003221339.37169.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, John Baldwin wrote: >> It looks like it also returns ESTALE when the inode is invalid (< >> ROOTINO || > max inodes?) - would an unlinked file in FFS referenced at >> a later time report an invalid inode? >> I'm no ufs guy, but the only way I can think of is if the file system on the server was newfs'd with fewer i-nodes? (Unlikely, but...) (Basically, it is safe to return ESTALE for anything that is not a transient failure that could recover on a retry.) >> But back to your point, zfs_zget() seems to be failing and returning the >> EINVAL before zfs_fhtovp() even has a chance to set and check zp_gen. >> I'm trying to get some more details through the use of gratuitous >> dprintf()'s, but they don't seem to be making it to any logs or the >> console even with vfs.zfs.debug=1 set. Any pointers on how to get these >> dprintf() calls working? I know diddly (as in absolutely nothing about zfs). > > That I have no idea on. Maybe Rick can chime in? I'm actually not sure why > we would want to treat a FHTOVP failure as anything but an ESTALE error in the > NFS server to be honest. > As far as I know, only if the underlying file system somehow has a situation where the file handle can't be translated at that point in time, but could be able to later. I have no idea if any file system is like that and I don't such a file system would be an appropriate choice for an NFS server, even if such a beast exists. (Even then, although FreeBSD's client assumes EIO might recover on a retry, that isn't specified in any RFC, as far as I know.) That's why I proposed a patch that simply translates all VFS_FHTOVP() errors to ESTALE in the NFS server. (It seems simpler than chasing down cases in all the underlying file systems?) rick, chiming in:-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.63.1003221942200.20197>