Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:55:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, crh@outpost.co.nz, chat@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Judge: "Gates Was Main Culprit" Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9911181852511.4274-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <000001bf31f5$62ce77b0$021d85d1@youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > It's not an example of the adoption of a lesser technology unless OS/2 >actually _is_ superior. Since it only "may have been", this is not a clear >example. Read over the full thread of what I said (cited above). > > And this is really only logical. If OS/2 had been clearly superior, many >OEMs would have refused Microsoft's terms, preferring to sell only the >superior technology to the inferior one. Wouldn't you think? > So really, then, all this debating over whether Unix or Windows is superior is academic, since it is a matter of personal opinion, right? All that really remains of substance is whether M$ acted illegally to reserve its market status. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9911181852511.4274-100000>